The immediate ancestor of humans may have lived almost exclusively on a diet of leaves, fruits, wood and bark instead of a menu based on the open savanna as other extinct relatives of humanity did, scientists claimed.
The findings, published in the journal Nature, are based on two million years old fossils of the extinct hominin Australopithecus sediba that were accidentally discovered by a scientist’s nine-year-old son in a South African cave in 2008.
Au-sediba’s mix of human and primitive traits has made a strong case for it being the immediate ancestor of the human lineage. Chimpanzees, humans’ closest living relatives, prefer fruits and leaves even when grasses are abundant. By contrast, extinct species of humans apparently preferred diets richer in grasses or grass-eating animals.
The findings suggest there wasn’t a single, straight line from an early, primitive hominin to humans, said study author Amanda Henry, a paleoanthropologist at Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany.
“Many of our ancestors and relatives branched out, tried new things and generally worked at doing what was best in their environment at that particular time,” Henry was quoted as saying by LiveScience.
According to scientists, what our ancient relatives might have eaten can be gauged by studying their teeth, particularly the marks and remnants left on them by food.
This can also be known by looking at the carbon isotopes making up fossils; the grasses that dominate savannas engage a kind of photosynthesis that involves both normal carbon-12 and heavier carbon-13, while trees and shrubs rely on a kind of photosynthesis that prefers carbon-12.
Man accused of biting wife’s ear let off by court
Reader’s Comments | Post a comment
Be the first to comment.